Google CEO asserts that Apple is selling privacy as a luxury good

When it comes to technology, privacy wants to survive universally accessible as well as useful to everyone, Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai has argued inward an op-ed written for The New York Times, which was published yesterday next the I/O keynote.

Apple has used its privacy stance to marketplace position its products as well as although Pichai’s op-ed doesn’t specifically refer Apple, it’s pretty clear who he had inward hear when writing these words:

‘For everyone’ is a essence philosophy for Google. It’s built into our mission to create products that are universally accessible as well as useful.

[…]

Our mission compels us to convey the same approach to privacy. For us, that agency privacy cannot survive a luxury practiced offered solely to people who tin sack afford to purchase premium products as well as services. Privacy must survive as available to everyone inward the world.

Google tried premium pricing alongside the Pixel line. When that didn’t locomote out as planned, they released a $399 telephone rivaling the $749 iPhone XR. But y'all can’t lay a dollar value on privacy. Sundar reiterated that Google volition never sell whatever personal information to 3rd parties as well as outlined the 3 basic ways people tin sack create upwards one's hear how their information is used.

First, information makes the products as well as services y'all usage to a greater extent than helpful to you. It’s what enables the Google Assistant to volume a rental machine for your trip, Maps to tell y'all how to navigate abode as well as Photos to part opor-garai pictures alongside a click of a button.

So far as well as then good.

Second, products usage anonymous information inward aggregate to survive to a greater extent than helpful to everyone. Traffic information inward Google Maps reduces gridlock past times offering people alternate routes. Queries inward Google Translate brand translations to a greater extent than accurate for billions of people. Anonymized searches over fourth dimension assist Search empathize your questions, fifty-fifty if y'all misspell them.

Yes, but Apple is using Differential Privacy as well as other techniques that convey payoff of on-device processing to get together insights as well as offering smart suggestions without breaching my privacy as well as sucking all my information into the cloud. What’s Google’s answer to that?

We’re also working difficult to challenge the supposition that products ask to a greater extent than information to survive to a greater extent than helpful. Data minimization is an of import privacy regulation for us as well as we’re encouraged past times advances developed past times Google AI researchers called Federated Learning.

So, Federated Learning is only your version of Differential Privacy?

It allows Google’s products to locomote improve for everyone without collecting raw information from your device. Federated learning is how Google’s Keyboard tin sack recognize as well as advise novel words similar ‘YOLO’ as well as ‘BTS’ later on thousands of people get typing them—without Google ever seeing anything y'all type. In the future, AI volition furnish fifty-fifty to a greater extent than ways to brand products to a greater extent than helpful alongside less data.

So y'all took a page from Apple’s volume there, got it.

Third, a pocket-sized subset of information helps serve ads that are relevant as well as that furnish the revenue that keeps Google products gratuitous as well as accessible. That revenue also sustains a wide community of content creators, which inward plough helps popular off along content on the spider web gratuitous for everyone.

Keeping content on the spider web gratuitous for everyone comes at a price. The vast bulk of non-techies who sign upwards for Gmail or Search or to a greater extent than or less other Google service don’t actually lead hold an thought they’ll survive tracked across the web. People similar my Mom are unaware that Google is constantly edifice comprehensive profiles on them because Google is intentionally keeping them inward the black as to tree nature of its information collection.

The information used inward ads could survive based on, for example, something y'all searched for or an online shop y'all browsed inward the past. It does non include the personal information inward apps such as Docs or Gmail. Still, if receiving a customized ads experience isn’t helpful, y'all tin sack plough it off. The pick is yours as well as nosotros attempt to acquire inward simple.

Only y'all don’t. In fellowship to popular off along Google from collecting your information for advertising as well as many other purposes, y'all actually lead hold to dig deep into your Google Account settings inward fellowship to uncovering as well as turn off features like Ad Personalization and Shared Endorsements, enabled past times default.

Sundar went on to debate that people today are rightly concerned nearly how their information is used as well as shared, “yet they all define privacy inward their ain ways.”

I’ve seen this firsthand as I speak to people inward unlike parts of the world. To the families using the cyberspace through a shared device, privacy powerfulness hateful privacy from 1 another. To the small-business possessor who wants to start accepting credit bill of fare payments, privacy agency keeping client information secure. To the teenager sharing selfies, privacy could hateful the powerfulness to delete that information inward the future.

People may “define privacy inward their ain ways” but I recall it’s pretty clear what it entails, as well as no 1 has defined privacy improve than Apple’s belatedly CEO Steve Jobs who said privacy is nearly “people knowing what they’re signing upwards for, inward manifestly English, as well as repeatedly.”

“I’m an optimist,” he said at the D8 conference dorsum inward 2010. “I believe people are smart, as well as to a greater extent than or less people desire to part to a greater extent than information than other people do. Ask them. Ask them every time.”

Earlier this calendar week inward an interview alongside CNBC’s Becky Quick, Tim Cook underscored that privacy is an integral business office of Apple’s concern because Apple “works for the consumer”.

We don’t desire to usage y'all as our product. And nosotros only lead hold a key number alongside doing that. And we’ve ever thought that the edifice of a detailed profile nearly your life could final result inward tragic things. Whether it’s a breach of your ain privacy or something where the information itself could survive used inward a nefarious way. And so, we’ve never thought it was correct to do it, as well as we’ve ever thought that y'all owned it.

“We don’t traffic inward your data,” he went on to say. “We really much are on your side. We also curate our platform.” Watch the relevant business office at score 11:13 inward the video embedded below.

Seeing how Apple’s been banging the privacy drum relentlessly, competitors who have been collecting user information en masse for years lead hold overnight decided that protecting user privacy is of import to them. Facebook, of all companies, recently announced a pin to privacy which volition final result alongside a unified end-to-end encrypted messaging service coming inward 2020.

Google on its business office announced to a greater extent than or less privacy-related initiatives at I/O.

For example, Google Search is getting Incognito Mode that prevents your searches from existence saved inward your Google Account. Incognito Mode is also coming to Google Maps for those times when you’d similar to have directions without sharing information alongside Google. And as of recently, y'all tin sack see YouTube as a logged-in user or inward Incognito Mode.

Moreover, Android Q includes novel iOS-like privacy controls designed to restrict what developers tin sack do alongside user data. That existence said, I don’t actually trust Google when it talks nearly privacy. To me, Pichai’s op-ed is a futile attempt in undermining its competitor’s messaging.

How do y'all experience nearly Sundar’s Definition of privacy?

Let us know past times leaving a comment below.

Illustration past times Yoshi Sodeoka, based on photograph past times Max Whitaker

Share this post