Apple details why it’s removed some apps that mimic Screen Time functionality

Following Sunday’s study inwards The New York Times revealing Apple lately cracked downwards on hide time-monitoring apps on App Store, the fellowship the next twenty-four hr current published a detailed explainer on its website.

First, the gist of the Times report:

Over the past times year, Apple has removed or restricted at to the lowest degree xi of the seventeen most downloaded screen-time too parental-control apps, according to an analysis past times The New York Times too Sensor Tower, an app-data firm. Apple has also clamped downwards on a issue of lesser-known apps. 

In some cases, Apple forced companies to take features that allowed parents to command their children’s devices or that blocked children’s access to sure enough apps too adult content. In other cases, it merely pulled the apps from its App Store.

The even asserts that Apple is pulling downwards these apps because they compete amongst Screen Time, its ain characteristic available on iPhone too iPad amongst iOS 12.

Apple spokeswoman Tammy Levine:

We process all apps the same, including those that compete amongst our ain services. Our incentive is to have got a vibrant app ecosystem that provides consumers access to every bit many character apps every bit possible.

She added that Apple removed or required changes to these apps because they could “gain besides much information” from users’ devices. She said the timing of Apple’s moves was non related to its introduction of its ain Screen Time characteristic inwards iOS 12.

What the fellowship constitute was that some of the hide time-monitoring apps available on App Store work its Mobile Device Management (MDM) applied scientific discipline inwards invasive ways, to monitor everything that happens on the user’s phone.

And here’s Apple’s statement on the affair inwards full:

Apple has ever believed that parents should have got tools to create practice their children’s device usage. It’s the argue nosotros created, too croak along to develop, Screen Time. Other apps in App Store, including Balance Screen Time past times Moment Health too Verizon Smart Family, give parents the powerfulness to residual the benefits of applied scientific discipline amongst other activities that aid immature minds larn too grow.

We lately removed several parental command apps from the App Store, too nosotros did it for a simple reason: they grade users’ privacy too security at risk. It’s of import to sympathize why too how this happened.

Over the concluding year, nosotros became aware that several of these parental command apps were using a highly invasive applied scientific discipline called Mobile Device Management, or MDM. MDM gives a 3rd party control too access over a device too its most sensitive information including user location, app use, e-mail accounts, photographic telly camera permissions too browsing history. We started exploring this work of MDM past times non-enterprise developers dorsum inwards early on 2017 too updated our guidelines based on that piece of work inwards mid-2017.

MDM does have got legitimate uses. Businesses volition sometimes install MDM on enterprise devices to maintain amend command over proprietary information too hardware. But it is incredibly risky—and a clear violation of App Store policies—for a private, consumer-focused app trouble concern to install MDM command over a customer’s device. Beyond the command that the app itself tin exert over the user’s device, inquiry has shown that MDM profiles could live on used past times hackers to gain access for malicious purposes.

Parents shouldn’t have got to merchandise their fears of their children’s device usage for risks to privacy too security, too App Store should non be a platform to forcefulness this choice. No one, except you, should have got unrestricted access to create practice your child’s device.

When nosotros constitute out virtually these guideline violations, nosotros communicated these violations to the app developers, giving them xxx days to submit an updated app to avoid availability pause inwards App Store. Several developers released updates to convey their apps inwards trace amongst these policies. Those that didn’t were removed from App Store.

We created App Store to furnish a secure, vibrant marketplace where developers too entrepreneurs tin convey their ideas to users worldwide, too users tin have got organized faith that the apps they abide by run across Apple’s standards of security too responsibility.

Apple has ever supported third-party apps on App Store that aid parents create practice their kids’ devices. Contrary to what The New York Times reported over the weekend, this isn’t a affair of competition. It’s a affair of security.

In this app category, too inwards every category, nosotros are committed to providing a competitive, innovative app ecosystem. There are many tremendously successful apps that offering functions too services similar to Apple’s inwards categories similar messaging, maps, email, music, spider web browsers, photos, note-taking apps, contact managers too payment systems, exactly to cite a few. We are committed to offering a house for these apps to thrive every bit they improve the user sense for everyone.

MacRumors reader Zachary Robinson emailed Tim Cook amongst his reactions to the even too received the following reply from marketing caput Phil Schiller.

Thank you lot for existence a fan of Apple too for your email.

I would similar to assure you lot that the App Store squad has acted extremely responsibly inwards this matter, helping to protect our children from technologies that could live on used to violate their privacy too security. After you lot larn of some of the facts I promise that you lot agree.

Unfortunately the New York Times article you lot reference did non portion our consummate statement, nor explicate the risks to children had Apple non acted on their behalf. Apple has long supported providing apps on App Store, that piece of work similar our ScreenTime feature, to aid parents create practice their children’s access to applied scientific discipline too nosotros volition croak along to encourage evolution of these apps.

However, over the concluding twelvemonth nosotros became aware that some parental management apps were using a applied scientific discipline called Mobile Device Management or MDM too installing an MDM Profile every bit a method to bound too command work of these devices. MDM is a applied scientific discipline that gives 1 political party access to too command over many devices, it was meant to live on used past times a fellowship on it’s ain mobile devices every bit a management tool, where that fellowship has a correct to all of the information too work of the devices.

The MDM applied scientific discipline is non intended to enable a developer to have got access to too command over consumers’ information too devices, but the apps nosotros removed from the shop did exactly that. No one, except you, should have got unrestricted access to create practice your child’s device, know their location, runway their app use, command their post service accounts, spider web surfing, photographic telly camera use, network access too fifty-fifty remotely erase their devices. Further, security inquiry has shown that in that location is run a peril that MDM profiles could live on used every bit a applied scientific discipline for hacker attacks past times assisting them inwards installing apps for malicious purposes on users’ devices.

When the App Store squad investigated the work of MDM applied scientific discipline past times some developers of apps for managing kids devices too learned the run a peril they create to user privacy too security, nosotros asked these developers to halt using MDM applied scientific discipline inwards their apps.

Protecting user privacy too security is paramount inwards the Apple ecosystem too nosotros have got of import App Store guidelines to non permit apps that could pose a threat to consumers privacy too security.

We volition croak along to furnish features, similar ScreenTime, designed to aid parents create practice their children’s access to applied scientific discipline too nosotros volition piece of work amongst developers to offering many great apps on App Store for these uses, using technologies that are security too individual for us too our children.

Thank you,

Phil.

Former Apple executive Tony Fadell, also know every bit the manly mortal nurture of the iPod music player, offered his take on the situation, proposing that Apple unloosen an official Screen Time API that makers of these apps could use.

Apple’s Screen Time yet has many holes too deficiencies. Their v1.0 solution was a rush project too it’s real non-intuitive to use. Apple should live on edifice truthful APIs for Screen Time too thus the privacy concerns are taken into trouble concern human relationship instead of limiting users App Store choices.

Here’s how that mightiness work.

We demand consummate digital wellness data. The API should comprehend both, usage information too controls. Apple should also furnish too enforce APIs for app developers to notify users too parents when a novel trouble concern human relationship is created or logins occur.

In his tweestorm, Fadell concluded that Apple shouldn’t discourage entrepreneurs from creating to a greater extent than solutions akin to Screen Time. That, he pointed out, is “the antithesis of what nosotros demand too every bit a responsible applied scientific discipline community nosotros tin practice better.”

I’m non sure enough sharing sensitive data— such every bit our how many times nosotros pick upwards the telephone per day, how many notifications nosotros receive, when nosotros engage amongst the Instagram app the most too and thus forth—is a clever catch because 1 time a developer gets grip of this data, there’s petty Apple tin practice to command whether it’s been used properly too non sold to a third-party.

There were some controversial app rejections too app removals inwards the past, but inwards this case—I side amongst Apple. We saw what sort of harm too privacy intrusions are possible when developers misuse enterprise certificates too MDM systems.

Had Apple gone later all hide time-monitoring apps on App Store, it could have got been defendant of anticompetitive behavior, but clearly they’re bully downwards exclusively on apps that specifically misuse MDM, too developers who used MDM applied scientific discipline inwards their apps clearly knew they were inwards violation of Apple’s guidelines.

What practice you lot brand of this?

Let us know past times leaving a comment below.

Share this post